Tutorial: Removing Fields
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
— Antoine de Saint-Exupery
When working on AddressBook, you will most likely find that some features and fields that are no longer necessary. In scenarios like this, you can consider refactoring the existing Person
model to suit your use case.
In this tutorial, we’ll do exactly just that and remove the grade
field from Person
.
Safely deleting Address
Fortunately, IntelliJ IDEA provides a robust refactoring tool that can identify most usages. Let’s try to use it as much as we can.
Assisted refactoring
The grade
field in Person
is actually an instance of the seedu.address.model.module.Gradeclass. Since removing the
Address class will break the application, we start by identifying
Address's usages. This allows us to see code that depends on
Address to function properly and edit them on a case-by-case basis. Right-click the
Address class and select
Refactor \>
Safe Delete` through the menu.
Choose to View Usages
and you should be presented with a list of Safe Delete Conflicts
. These conflicts describe locations in which the Address
class is used.
Remove usages of Address
by performing Safe Delete
s on each entry. You will need to exercise discretion when removing usages of Address
. Functions like ParserUtil#parseAddress()
can be safely removed but its usages must be removed as well. Other usages like in EditPersonDescriptor
may require more careful inspection.
Let’s try removing references to Address
in EditPersonDescriptor
.
-
Safe delete the field
grade
inEditPersonDescriptor
. -
Select
Yes
when prompted to remove getters and setters. -
Select
View Usages
again.
-
Remove the usages of
grade
and selectDo refactor
when you are done.Tip: Removing usages may result in errors. Exercise discretion and fix them. For example, removing thegrade
field from thePerson
class will require you to modify its constructor. -
Repeat the steps for the remaining usages of
Address
After you are done, verify that the application still works by compiling and running it again.
Manual refactoring
Unfortunately, there are usages of Address
that IntelliJ IDEA cannot identify. You can find them by searching for instances of the word grade
in your code (Edit
> Find
> Find in path
).
Places of interest to look out for would be resources used by the application. main/resources
contains images and fxml
files used by the application and test/resources
contains test data. For example, there is a $grade
in each PersonCard
that has not been removed nor identified.
A quick look at the PersonCard
class and its fxml
file quickly reveals why it slipped past the automated refactoring.
PersonCard.java
...
@FXML
private Label grade;
...
PersonCard.fxml
...
<Label fx:id="phone" styleClass="cell_small_label" text="\$phone" />
<Label fx:id="grade" styleClass="cell_small_label" text="\$grade" />
<Label fx:id="email" styleClass="cell_small_label" text="\$email" />
...
After removing the Label
, we can proceed to formally test our code. If everything went well, you should have most of your tests pass. Fix any remaining errors until the tests all pass.
Tidying up
At this point, your application is working as intended and all your tests are passing. What’s left to do is to clean up references to Address
in test data and documentation.
In src/test/data/
, data meant for testing purposes are stored. While keeping the grade
field in the json files does not cause the tests to fail, it is not good practice to let cruft from old features accumulate.
invalidPersonAddressBook.json
:
{
"modules": [ {
"moduleName": "Person with invalid moduleName field: Ha!ns Mu@ster",
"phone": "9482424",
"email": "hans@example.com",
"grade": "4th street"
} ]
}
You can go through each individual json
file and manually remove the grade
field.